Synergy Publication
Synergy Publication International Open Access Scholarly Publishing Platform

Policies

Our editorial, ethical and publishing policies.

Governance Framework

Editorial Policies & Guidelines

Synergy Publication maintains the highest standard of editorial integrity, academic rigor, and ethical publishing. Our comprehensive editorial policies ensure that all research published under our imprint is scientifically sound, original, and compliant with global ethical publishing norms.

Scientifically Sound Original Ethically Compliant
Peer
Review
Conflict
Disclosure
Scientific
Integrity
Correction &
Retraction
Policy 01

Editorial Independence & Peer Review

Our editorial decisions are entirely independent of commercial interests, sponsorship, or organizational biases. Editors-in-Chief retain complete authority over the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts.

1

Pre-Screening Phase

All submissions undergo a strict pre-screening to assess alignment with journal scope and a basic checklist of academic standards.

Scope Check Format Review Standards Checklist
2

Double-Blind Peer Review

Manuscripts are sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in a strict double-blind process, ensuring unbiased evaluation.

2+ Reviewers Double-Blind Independent Experts

Full editorial independence — decisions are never influenced by commercial interests, sponsorship, or organizational biases.

Policy 02

Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

Authors, editors, and peer reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflict of interest that could influence their judgment or interpretation of the research.

Authors
At submission stage
Editors
Throughout process
Reviewers
Before evaluation
Financial Interests Employment, consultancy, patents, or stock ownership
Personal Relationships Family, friends, or close associations
Professional Rivalries Competitive or adversarial relationships

If a conflict is discovered, it must be disclosed immediately to the editorial board.

Policy 03

Scientific Integrity & Human/Animal Subjects

Research involving human participants, tissues, or animals must be conducted in full compliance with recognized international ethical guidelines, such as the Declaration of Helsinki.

IRB / Ethics Approval

Authors must state that they have obtained institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee approval.

Mandatory

Informed Consent

Informed consent must be obtained from all human participants where applicable.

Where Applicable
Declaration of Helsinki

All human/animal research must comply with this internationally recognized ethical framework for medical research.

Policy 04

Correction, Addenda & Retraction Policy

We believe in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. If a significant error is detected in a published article, we will publish a correction, erratum, or addendum in the next issue.

Significant Error

A correction, erratum, or addendum is published in the next issue.

Correction Erratum Addendum

Academic Misconduct

In extreme cases of misconduct, plagiarism, or fabricated data, the article will be retracted.

Plagiarism Fabricated Data Retraction

Retractions follow the COPE Retraction Guidelines to ensure due process and transparency.

4 Core Policies

Integrity at Every Stage of Publishing

From submission to publication, our policies ensure every article meets the highest standards of scholarly integrity.

Independent Review Full Disclosure Ethical Compliance Record Integrity
facebook Share
twitter Post
email Email
copy link Copy Link
linkedin Share
reddit Share
whatsapp Share
messenger Share