Editorial Policies
Editorial Policies & Guidelines
Review
Disclosure
Integrity
Retraction
Editorial Independence & Peer Review
Our editorial decisions are entirely independent of commercial interests, sponsorship, or organizational biases. Editors-in-Chief retain complete authority over the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts.
Pre-Screening Phase
All submissions undergo a strict pre-screening to assess alignment with journal scope and a basic checklist of academic standards.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Manuscripts are sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in a strict double-blind process, ensuring unbiased evaluation.
Full editorial independence — decisions are never influenced by commercial interests, sponsorship, or organizational biases.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Authors, editors, and peer reviewers are required to disclose any potential conflict of interest that could influence their judgment or interpretation of the research.
If a conflict is discovered, it must be disclosed immediately to the editorial board.
Scientific Integrity & Human/Animal Subjects
Research involving human participants, tissues, or animals must be conducted in full compliance with recognized international ethical guidelines, such as the Declaration of Helsinki.
All human/animal research must comply with this internationally recognized ethical framework for medical research.
Correction, Addenda & Retraction Policy
We believe in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. If a significant error is detected in a published article, we will publish a correction, erratum, or addendum in the next issue.
Retractions follow the COPE Retraction Guidelines to ensure due process and transparency.