Networked Learning Environments and Educational Collaboration in the Digital Age

Latika Khullar; Upasana Ray

doi:10.63960/ksrmhm06

Authors

Latika Khullar Department of Educational Studies, Jamia Milia Islamia, Delhi, India Author
Upasana Ray Central Institute of Educational Technology, National Council of Educational Research and Training Author

https://doi.org/10.63960/ksrmhm06

Keywords:

Networked Learning Environments, Digital Sociality, Educational Collaboration, Pedagogical Infrastructure, Digital Pedagogy, Learner Engagement, Teacher Roles, Ethical Challenges in Education, Hybrid Learning, Educational Technology

Abstract

Digitally networked environments have become increasingly embedded within contemporary education across diverse institutional contexts, reshaping how teaching, learning, and collaboration are organized and experienced. Moving beyond platform-centric and tool-oriented accounts that have characterized much educational technology discourse, this study conceptualizes networked learning environments as educational infrastructures that structure interaction, participation, and pedagogical relationships. Drawing on infrastructure studies, critical educational technology scholarship, and sociocultural learning theory, the study examines how digital sociality mediates communication, collaboration, learner engagement, and multimodal expression across educational contexts. Particular attention is given to the evolving roles of teachers and learners, highlighting shifts toward facilitation, curation, learner agency, and shared responsibility for learning. The study also critically addresses constraints and ethical tensions associated with networked learning, including concerns related to privacy, data governance, attention, inequality, and well-being. Rather than offering platform-specific prescriptions, the study articulates guiding principles for thoughtful and ethically grounded integration of networked environments into educational practice. By framing networked learning as an ongoing educational condition rather than a temporary technological trend, the study contributes to contemporary debates on pedagogy, digital sociality, and the future of education in digitally mediated societies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Latika Khullar, Department of Educational Studies, Jamia Milia Islamia, Delhi, India

Latika Khullar is an Indian educational researcher, academic, and doctoral scholar at the Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Education, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi. She holds a Bachelor of Elementary Education from Delhi University and a Master of Education (M.Ed.) from Jamia Millia Islamia. A qualified educator who has cleared both papers of the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET), her research focuses primarily on educational equity, disability justice, socioeconomic stratification, and the structural challenges faced by marginalized student populations in India.

Competing Interests:
The authors declares no conflict of Interest for this study.
Upasana Ray, Central Institute of Educational Technology, National Council of Educational Research and Training

Dr. Upasana Ray is an Associate Professor at the Planning & Research Division of the Central Institute of Educational Technology (CIET), National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT), New Delhi. She possesses extensive experience across prestigious higher education institutions, having previously served at the Central University of Jharkhand, Kolhan University, and the Regional Institute of Education (RIE), Bhubaneswar. Dr. Ray plays a leading national role in foundational curriculum implementation and educational technology innovation. Notably, she serves as the key coordinator for e-Jaadui Pitara, an AI-driven, digital extension of NCERT’s play-based learning initiative designed to scale foundational language development and toy-based pedagogy to remote areas across India.

Competing Interests:
The authors declares no conflict of Interest for this study.

References ▼

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.

Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487563

Asagar, M. S. (2024). The Benefits and Challenges of Flipped Learning: A Study on Students’ Perception. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(3), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.63960/synergyint.j.multidiscip.stud.v1i3.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/synergyint.j.multidiscip.stud..v1i3.25

Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Baym, N. K., & boyd, d. (2012). Socially mediated publicness: An introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705200

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.). (2013). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203078952

Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Paradigm Publishers.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press.

Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001

Boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

Boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674251083

Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Polity Press.

Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.

Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. Teachers College Press.

Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026239

Facer, K. (2011). Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817308

García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The transformation of higher education after the COVID disruption: Emerging challenges in an online learning scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 616059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms.’ New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029

Gregg, M. (2011). Work’s intimacy. Polity Press.

Haque, M. I. (2024). School Teachers’ Awareness and Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Science Education: A Study of Secondary School. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.63960/sijmds-2024-119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/sijmds-2024-119

Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18(5), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108195

Haythornthwaite, C., & Andrews, R. (2011). E-learning theory and practice. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288566

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 51–82). MIT Press.

Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219

Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

Jacob, O. N., & Stanojevich, J. M. (2024). Post-pandemic education: Persistence of digital practices and hybrid learning modalities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 401–418.

Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. Routledge.

Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

Koschmann, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 1–23). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: Exploring contemporary methods of communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.

Krishnamurthy, S. (2020). The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 117, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class: Living and learning in the digital age. NYU Press.

Luke, A., Woods, A., & Weir, K. (2018). Curriculum, syllabus design, and equity: A primer and model. Routledge.

Lupton, D., & Williamson, B. (2017). The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society, 19(5), 780–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686328

Mihailidis, P., & Cohen, J. N. (2013). Exploring curation as a core competency in digital and media literacy education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-02

Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn” in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364401

Naaz, F. (2025). Enhancing ICT Integration: Addressing Teachers’ Perspectives and Institutional Challenges in Schools. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.63960/synergyint.j.multidiscip.stud.v2i1.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/synergyint.j.multidiscip.stud..v2i1.36

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.

Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.

Oliver, M. (2005). The problem with affordance. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(4), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.4.402

Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106

Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523

Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553

Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79

Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192

Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.008

Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory, and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9351.001.0001

Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x

Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315886350

Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.921628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.921628

Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.

Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952

Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2014). The politics of education and technology: Conflicts, controversies, and connections. Palgrave Macmillan.

Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. (2018). Everyday schooling in the digital age: High school, high tech? Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315115764

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.025

Stahl, G., Ludvigsen, S., Law, N., & Cress, U. (2014). CSCL artifacts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9200-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9200-0

Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111

Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

van Deursen, A. J., Helsper, E. J., Eynon, R., & van Dijk, J. A. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 452–473.

van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In L. Robinson, S. R. Cotten, J. Schulz, T. M. Hale, & A. Williams (Eds.), Communication and information technologies annual (Vol. 10, pp. 29–52). Emerald Group Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002

van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959

van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001

van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.12924/mac2013.01010002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v1i1.70

van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001

Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.

Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920

Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in higher education: Critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811

Wollscheid, S., Scholkmann, A., Capasso, M., & Olsen, D. S. (2023). Digital transformations in higher education in result of the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a scoping review. In R. Pinheiro, C. E. Tømte, L. Barman, L. Degn, & L. Geschwind (Eds.), Digital transformations in Nordic higher education (pp. 217–242). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27758-0_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27758-0_10

Yadav, S., & Khullar, L. (2024). Social Media and Adolescents: Exploring Links to Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 29–45. https://sijmds.com/index.php/pub/article/view/19

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Networked Learning Environments and Educational Collaboration in the Digital Age

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

Author Biographies

References ▼

Downloads

Article Metrics

Published

Data Availability Statement

Supporting Agencies

Competing Interests

Crossref Metrics

Recently Cited By:

View your Article in Google Scholar

View your Article in DOAJ

Dimension (Article) Metrics

Plu.mx (Article) Metrics

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite

Similar Articles

ISSN

Make a Submission

Payment System

Quick Access

Keywords

Browse Articles

Visitors

Latest publications

Share

Browse

Information

Similar Articles

Learning Beyond Textbooks: Vocational and Skill-Based Education through Bagless Day Activities

Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education in the Public Sphere: A Review of Their Role in Strengthening Democracy

Learner-Centred Pedagogy in Indian Social Science Education: Policy Intent, Classroom Realities, and Global Insights

Tracing the Evolution from Pedagogy to Heutagogy in Teacher Education: A Scientometric Perspective

Implementation of Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) under the National Education Policy 2020 in India: A Policy Perspective

Understanding Teachers’ Preparedness for Climate Change and Sustainability Education: A Narrative Review (2015–2026)

Effect of Brain Plasticity-Based Activities on Attention among Students with Specific Learning Disabilities in Inclusive Schools

The Mediating Role of Resilience in the relationship between Moral Values and Psychological Well-Being