Articles Open Access Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): May 2026

Learner-Centred Pedagogy in Indian Social Science Education: Policy Intent, Classroom Realities, and Global Insights

  • Iram Sarver 1
1 Department of Educational Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
Received: Published:
doi https://doi.org/10.63960/sp.2026.jtple.1.2.8
Published: 2026-05-31

Abstract

Learner-centred teaching has been a key focus of Social Science education reform in India since the National Curriculum Framework (NCF) 2005. It was further reinforced in the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE) 2023. These documents emphasise constructivist learning, inquiry, critical thinking, and students' active roles. However, many classrooms in Indian schools still focus mainly on textbooks and exams. This gap between policy intent and classroom practice has been documented across various Indian educational contexts, highlighting persistent challenges in pedagogical transformation. In contrast, education systems around the world, such as those in Finland, the United States, and other countries, use case-based and problem-based learning models, especially in Social Studies. This paper analyses the differences between learner-centred teaching in India and inquiry-oriented teaching methods in selected global contexts. The study argues that the issues in India stem not from policy intentions but from contextual challenges, including large class sizes, assessment methods, limited teacher autonomy, and resource disparities. These challenges are further compounded by the need for aligned teacher professional development and institutional support. Instead of simply copying global models, the paper proposes ways to adapt global best practices to Indian contexts. It uses studies, debates, and problem-solving tasks that can be integrated into existing textbook material without adding to the curriculum burden. The paper concludes that a context-sensitive approach to integrating inquiry-based and case-based learning, rooted in Indian social realities, can help close the gap between learner-centred policies and actual classroom practices. This could enhance the transformative potential of Social Science education in India.

Keywords

# Learner-Centred Pedagogy # Inquiry-Based Learning # Comparative Education # Social Science Education # NCERT Textbooks # NCF 2005 # NCF-SE 2023

Author Biography

Iram Sarver (Department of Educational Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India)

Iram Sarver is a Senior Research Fellow and Ph.D. scholar in the Department of Educational Studies at Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi. Her core doctoral research investigates the critical dynamics of Refugee Education, exploring equitable learning access and policy frameworks. With an academic foundation spanning an M.Ed. from JMI and an M.A. in Counselling Psychology, her work bridges educational policy with mental health advocacy. Her broader academic interests include Inclusive Education, Educational Psychology, and the Internationalization of Education. She has actively shared her insights through published work tracking primary stakeholder educational challenges.

  1. Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards Dialogic Teaching: rethinking classroom talk (4th Edition). Dialogos.
  2. Apple, M., & Apple, M.W. (2018). Ideology and Curriculum (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400384
  3. Asagar, M. S. (2025). Digital competence in education: A comparative analysis of frameworks and conceptual foundations. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.63960/synergyint.j.multidiscip.stud..v2i1.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/synergyint.j.multidiscip.stud..v2i1.34
  4. Au, W. (2007). High‑stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258‑267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
  5. Bermudez, A. (2015). Four Tools For Critical Inquiry in History, Social Studies, and Civic Education. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 1(52), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.7440/res52.2015.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/res52.2015.07
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7‑74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  7. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher‑pupil interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715‑730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21‑32. Retrieved from https://digitalauthorship.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/the-act-of-discovery-bruner.pdf
  9. Class, B. (2024). Teaching research methods in education: using the TPACK framework to reflect on praxis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 47(3), 288–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2270426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2023.2270426
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
  11. Evagorou, M., Vrikki, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2023). Students’ and teachers’ voice on the outcomes of a citizenship education curriculum. Citizenship Social and Economic Education, 22(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/14788047231193917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14788047231193917
  12. Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.). (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  13. Grant, S. G., Swan, K., & Lee, J. (2022). Inquiry‑based practice in social studies education: Understanding the inquiry design model. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003262800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003262800
  14. Hamblin, T. (2025). How do average citizens solve civic problems? A lesson from an interdisciplinary, inquiry‑based curriculum. The Great Lakes Social Studies Journal, 9(1), 1‑18. https://doi.org/10.25035/glssj.05.02.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/glssj.05.02.06
  15. Hessberg, K. (2012). PBL? A case study of inquiry learning in a secondary civics course (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest.
  16. Huijgen, T., van Boxtel, C., van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2017). Toward Historical Perspective Taking: Students’ Reasoning When Contextualizing the Actions of People in the Past. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(1), 110–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597
  17. Kangas, M., & Rasi, P. (2021). Phenomenon‑based learning of multiliteracy in a Finnish upper secondary school. Media Practice and Education, 22(3), 279‑298. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2021.1977769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2021.1977769
  18. Keegan, L. C., & Losardo, A. (2017). Problem‑based learning and civic engagement in undergraduate education. Communication Education, 66(4), 1‑19. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/88676469/Problem_Based_Learning_and_Civic_Engagement_in_Undergraduate_Education DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740116685184
  19. Khullar, L., & Ray, U. (2026). Networked Learning Environments and Educational Collaboration in the Digital Age. Journal of Transformative Pedagogies and Learner Engagement, 1(1), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.63960/ksrmhm06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/ksrmhm06
  20. Kumar, K. (2005). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://arvindguptatoys.com/arvindgupta/pol-agenda-kk.pdf
  21. Levstik, L. S., & Barton, K. C. (2015). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools (5th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315818108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315818108
  22. Mir, G. A. T. (2013). What is my pedagogy? Shifting understandings and practices of teachers in government schools in Kashmir, India. University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/187c80ba-0037-4fb0-bd01-6de1a8b1a1cf/content
  23. National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The C3 framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K‑12 civics, economics, geography, and history. NCSS. Retrieved from https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/c3/C3-Framework-for-Social-Studies.pdf
  24. NCERT. (2005). National Curriculum Framework 2005. National Council of Educational Research and Training. Retrieved from https://educationforallinindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/National-Curriculum-Framework-2005-NCERT-English.pdf
  25. NCERT. (2023). National Curriculum Framework for School Education. National Council of Educational Research and Training. Retrieved from https://ncert.nic.in/pdf/focus-group/NCF-SE_2023EN.pdf
  26. P, K. (2026). Tracing the evolution from pedagogy to heutagogy in teacher education: A scientometric perspective. Journal of Transformative Pedagogies and Learner Engagement, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63960/gcn9j739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/gcn9j739
  27. Palsa, L., & Mertala, P. (2022). Disciplinary contextualisation of transversal competence in Finnish curricula: The case of social studies. Education Inquiry, 13(2), 245‑262. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1855827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1855827
  28. Parey, M. A. (2025). Dialogic pedagogy as a liberatory praxis in schooling: Challenging power dynamics and neoliberalism in the context of schools in Kashmir. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.63960/SIJMDS-2025-2270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/sijmds-2025-2270
  29. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773‑784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495
  30. Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia University Press. Retrieved from https://www.rexresearch1.com/PiagetChildPsychologyLibrary/GeneticEpistemology.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/piag91272
  31. Rowland, R. M. (2022). A Problem‑Based Learning Approach to Civics Education: Exploring Citizenship Through Authentic Scenarios (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7620&context=etd
  32. Ruhalahti, S. (2019). Redesigning a Pedagogical Model for Scaffolding Dialogical, Digital and Deep Learning in Vocational Teacher Education. University of Lapland. Retrieved from https://lauda.ulapland.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/63734/Ruhalahti.Sanna.Acta%20elec-tronica%20Universitatis%20Lapponiensis%20257.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
  33. Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/19-%20Finnish%20Lessons%202.0%20What%20Can%20the%20World%20Learn%20from%20Educational%20Change%20in%20Finland,%20Second%20Edition.pdf
  34. Singh, G., & Maurya, H. K. (2026). Learning beyond textbooks: Vocational and skill‑based education through bagless day activities. Journal of Transformative Pedagogies and Learner Engagement, 1(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.63960/vtnwfv10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63960/vtnwfv10
  35. Singh, J., & Agarwal, T. (2023). Creating an equitable space for teaching and learning: Towards theory and evidence‑based practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003407478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003407478
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://home.fau.edu/musgrove/web/vygotsky1978.pdf

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Copied to clipboard